LA-UR-19-24624
Frontiers Summer School
Thursday May 16$^{th}$ 2019
Center
for Theoretical
ASTROPHYSICS
History lesson
Nucleosynthesis
Where nuclear physics comes in
Heavy element nucleosynthesis
Concluding remarks
How can we reconcile this observation with what we know?
Gravitational contraction: first proposed by Mayer, Helmholtz and lord Kelvin
Involves converting gravitational potential energy into heat
This was the leading postulate in the 1800's
Question: How long would the sun radiate under this assumption?
Let's assume the heat from the sun is radiation dominated
Q = $\sigma$$T^{4}$$A$
$\sigma$: Stefan-Boltzmann constant
$T$: Temperature
$A$: Surface area
$Q \sim 5.67 \times 10^{-8} \times $${5800}^4$$ \times 6.09 \times 10^{12} \times 1000^{2} \sim $$3.9 \times 10^{26}$ Watts
Considering gravitational potential energy
$G$: gravitational constant
$M$: mass of the sun $\sim 2 \times 10^{30}$ kg
$R$: radius of the sun $\sim 700$ million meters
$E \sim 2.3 \times 10^{41}$ Joules
So ... lifetime $\sim (2.3 \times 10^{41}) / (3.9 \times 10^{26}) \sim 5.8 \times 10^{14}$ seconds
18 million years
Nope...
Who came up with the idea of using nuclear physics?
Nuclear reactions release energy that power stars
"The internal constitution of the stars" (1920)
A little bit of mass can create a lot of energy
Question: What percentage of mass will generate enough energy for the sun to last billions of years?
(only 0.07% is needed)
This was the start of nuclear physics + astrophysics → nuclear astrophysics
Question: How long would the sun last if it ran on fossil fuels?
nu·cle·o·syn·the·sis The formation of new atomic nuclei by nuclear reactions, thought to occur in the interiors of stars and in the early stages of development of the universe.
Abundance is a quantity denoting how much stuff
Question: Where do we get this observational information?
Hint: The sun has 99% of the mass of the solar system
(Answer: meteorites and photospheric observations)
The formation of the heavy elements didn't occur all at the same time nor the same place
This requires a lot of detective work...
Created most of the hydrogen (H) and helium (He) in the universe.
Started within the first 3 minutes of the beginning of the universe.
Ended within about 20 minutes due to expanding and cooling.
Only 12 key reactions to take into account (easy!?)
Remember the dip in the solar abundances?
Nuclear fuel for the existence of stars
This is area is a hot topic of current research...
of nuclear physics in astrophysics
In the isotopic abundances there were two bumps
This implies two different processes are happening
of nuclear physics in astrophysics
Question: What is causing the major bumps (peaks)?
Nuclear structure!
$s$-process: neutron capture rates are slow relative to $\beta$-decay; $\tau_n$$ \gg $$\tau_\beta$
$(Z,N) + n$ ↔ $(Z,N+1) + \gamma$
$(Z,N)$ → $(Z+1,N-1) + e^{-} + \bar{\nu}_{e}$
$s$-process: neutron capture rates are slow relative to $\beta$-decay; $\tau_n$$ \gg $$\tau_\beta$
This process stays very close to the stable isotopes • most nuclear physics inputs are known
Primarily occurring in AGB stars
$(Z,N) + n$ ↔ $(Z,N+1) + \gamma$
Key components: Optical potential • $\gamma$-ray strength function ($\gamma$SF) • Nuclear Level Density (NLD)
$(Z,N)$ → $(Z+1,N-1) + e^{-} + \bar{\nu}_{e}$
Key components: Fermi's Golden Rule • nuclear levels • binding energies • $\gamma$SF / NLD
As we add neutrons: $Q_{beta}$ ⇡ $S_{n}$ ⇣ so what happens?
We release more neutrons!
We're going to go far from the stable isotopes (further to the right)!
This is known as the rapid neutron capture process ($r$-process)
Believed to be responsible for roughly half the elements above iron
All of the actinides are produced by this nucleosynthesis process; many neutrons required
Major problem: We only have hints of where this process occurs in nature
Another major problem: we barely have any nuclear data in this region
Why?... nuclei are short-lived
End of the life of a massive star
Extremely luminous - burst of radiation that can outshine host galaxy for several weeks expelling the star's material
Can it produce neutron-rich material? This is under debate... MHD jets?
Requires exascale computing to properly model in full 3D
Merger of two neutron stars • merger of neutron star with black hole
Very rare events • lots of neutrons! • different types of ejecta
Every possible neutron-rich species that could exist in nature may be accessed (1000's)
Problem: we have some (incomplete) data for several hundred...
We need binding energies, decay rates, branching ratios, reaction rates, even fission information
There's no way around this... we require nuclear theory
1st order: masses, $\beta$-decay rates, capture rates & fission
The chart of nuclides
All half-lives
Nuclear masses
Neutron capture rates
As of today, to varying degrees of accuracy
FRIB as the $r$-process machine
Heavy nucleus is unstable (naturally or via particle absorption) splitting into two lighter fragments
Breaking configuration is known as scission
Ensemble of events produces a fission yield
The high amount of energy released makes it interesting for observations
combine nuclear physics inputs with astrophysical conditions
Nuclear physics is intimately connected to astrophysics
Nucleosynthesis is one aspect of this connection
There are many different nucleosynthesis processes
Big Bang ▴ $s$-process ▴ $r$-process
The formation of the heaviest elements still remains an unsolved problem
FRIB and other facilities will help in this endeavor by constraining nuclear theories used in calculations
More information @ MatthewMumpower.com